Highlights of the US Forest Service Report on its Handling of the Station Fire
Full report here: Download Station-report-11-13-2009(2)
Summary: the fire spread out of control because it spread to terrain too steep for firefighters to safely confront the flames and not because of delays in ordering water-dropping aircraft and more crews.
… using aircraft to dump water or retardant without ground crews to help out would have been ineffective.
"Additional resources during the evening of Aug. 26 and morning of Aug. 27 would not have improved the effectiveness of operations during that operational period and would have resulted in needless exposure of firefighters to the hazards of wildland fire."
Highlights of the report
The
origin of the Station Fire was in extremely rugged terrain with limited
opportunities for safe suppression activities by ground-based suppression
resources.
The
ordering and assignment of firefighting resources to initial attack was
appropriate and consistent with accepted fire management practices. Additional
ground tactical resources would not have improved the effectiveness of
operations because they could not be safely deployed.
Incident
management decisions made during the review period were consistent with
generally accepted incident management practices. Decisions made by initial
attack incident commanders reflected sound judgment of the operational
situation and were prudent with respect to firefighter effectiveness, safety,
and suppression resource deployment.
In light
of the extremely challenging topography encountered during initial attack and
the highly volatile fire and vegetation conditions, incident commanders were
reasonable and prudent in not exposing firefighters to actions that would have
been ineffective and compromised their safety.
Los Angeles County Supervisor Mike Antonovich disputed the findings, insisting the Forest Service miscalculated by not bringing in more aircraft in the early hours of the fire.
Had more aircraft been used, including at night, when the Forest Service is hesitant to fly, "the fire would not have spread," Antonovich said in a statement Friday.

Thanks Andrew for your comments
As I get more information I will share on this blog and the Altadena Blog.
Alice
Posted by: Alice | November 16, 2009 at 09:43 PM
I'm sorry, this report is nothing but self-protective BS.
At Mt. Wilson Observatory the fire was significantly slowed by lines of fire retardant placed days in advance. As the fire moved on the top of the mountain, you could see the pink lines in the forest where the retardant had been laid down.
"Air resources alone would been ineffective" - how can they possibly say that? You could say the same thing about the fire at Rancho Palos Verdes that occurred the same weekend. and yet that fire was attacked consistently from the air overnight...and the majority homes there were protected successfully.
Posted by: Andrew B | November 16, 2009 at 09:36 PM
Hi Barbara
I suspect that this fire will be argued for how it was handled for years.
So much of our emergency response system failed during this fire, including the LAFD, USFS and the county's response ie it's reverse 911.
But I hope we all develop good lessons learned for next time
Otherwise, it is all "sound and fury".
Alice
Posted by: Alice | November 16, 2009 at 06:04 PM
Glad Antonovich disputes this, because the report sure sounds like self-protection.
Posted by: Barbara | November 16, 2009 at 05:38 PM